I don't often mention my adoptive parents on this blog. Mostly because this blog is my personal exploration of my life before my adoption (however brief) and the affects that having been PLACED for adoption have had on me.
Note that I did NOT say "the affects that being adopted have had on me." Because that is something completely different.
I see a lot of vilinization of adoption parents in the blog sphere. A lot. Mostly (but not exclusively) from natural parents. Obviously I recognize that writing an entire post about how awesome my adoptive parents are and how they don't comform to the typical stereotypes would only validate what the naysayers are writing- that I'm just another silly little adoptee who is stuck in the cycle of loyalty and adopter worship. That I only love my adoptive parents because they've tricked me into doing so, that if I were really educated about adoption ethics, I would realize that "those people" are not my parents and even though they raised me from babyhood, they are nothing more than long time babysitters who I happen to care about.
And (my favorite claim yet) that my adoptive parents are directly responsible for my having been placed out of my natural family, and that they "took me" from my family of origin and should be ashamed.
Here are a few (slightly depressing) facts:
1- My mother and father would have placed me for adoption nomatter what. The people who adopted me were NOT matched with my bio parents from the beginning. In fact, my mother had chosen a completely different couple. They were from New Jersey. The had an on going relationship with my mother for about 4 months, until they were offered another baby who was already born. Needless to say, they dropped my mother immediately and took the other baby. My mother was deeply hurt and offended, because she thought they wanted "her baby"... not just any baby.
2- I was a (very) white, blonde, female infant who was born at over 8 lbs and was perfectly healthy. There would never have been a shortage of people willing to adopt me. If it hadn't been my parents, it would have been the next couple in line. Who might have been better, or worse. It's a roll of the dice.
3- My birthmother changed her mind after I was born. My parents, heartbroken, went back to NY and gave up on the idea of adopting a child. A few months later, my birthmother called THEM telling them that she had changed her mind and asking if they would adopt the baby.
4-My birthmother chose to raise me for a while, and only changed her mind when my father threatened to leave her. He and his (well off, bullish) family pressured and coerced her. Its was a pretty desperate/ despicable situation, but it had nothing to do with my adoptive parents, who had left the picture weeks beforehand. Had they refused to adopt me, my mother and father would have found someone else.
The only people who could have prevented me from being placed for adoption are the people who chose to do it.. my natural parents. Had my father wanted me, they would have kept me. And had my mother been strong enough to keep me despite my fathers outright refusal, she would have. She wanted to, and she almost did. But in the end, he won.
I try and avoid placing blame when it comes to adoption. Mostly because its completely useless. However, the only two adults in the equation who hold NO blame are my adoptive parents- who simply wanted to raise another child, even though they had a bio son of their own. If it hadn't been me, maybe they would have adopted another child. I can't know for sure.
I'm not really pro adoption. I think it's too complex a situation to ever be simple and "good". There is good and bad. And I think the negative aspects of being adopted make adoption something that should be avoided at all costs. I would like to see adoption less practiced. But I don't think that trying to convince potential adoptive parents that what they are doing is the way to go. There is nothing wrong with wanting to raise a child. There IS something wrong with feeling entitled to a baby that isn't yours, but I don't think that wanting to adopt a baby automatically means that one feels entitled. Adoption, is a system, is well received in our society. It will never be seen by the general population as a "bad thing to do". And the reality is this: for every potential adoptive parent who the rest of the adoption community scares away, there are 5 more willing to take their place. There are a lot of people willing to adopt a baby, but very few willing to give one up.
My natural parents are responsible for having given me up. Especially my father, who was the force behind my relinquishment. He knows this, and I know this. He doesn't feel much of anything towards my adoptive parents (his words). Not because they haven't treated him respectfully and welcomed him (they have). Not because they did a bad job raising me or convinced me that I belong only to them (they didn't and they haven't). But he admits that he feels territorial when it comes to me- that despite the family he chose for me and whom I was raised with, he can't help but feel that I'm "his little girl". And I think sometimes those feelings get in the way.
He and I don't agree on everything. We debate a lot of things (the way his family treats me, the way he handled things with my mother at the time of my birth, etc). He advises me, and I consider him a loving and wise man. I care about him very deeply and will discuss most anything with him. But I do not allow him to criticize my adoptive parents. Not to me. Not because they were perfect (of course they weren't). But because he, as the man who was my father, chose to surrender me to a basically unknown future. He didn't want me, and they did. And though logically I know that things aren't that simple...emotionally I am SURE that they are. Whether by divine providence, universal wisdom, or pure coincidence- when my parents weren't there for me, there was another couple who was. I respect my natural father and consider him a father- all I ask in return is that he respect the fact that I am part of another family besides his own (one that he chose, no less), and that even if my family isn't real to him, it's real to me.
9 commenti:
"the only two adults in the equation who hold NO blame are my adoptive parents"
Same for me Amanda. To read things like "no adoption is ethical" just pisses me off. If my parents hadn't adopted me, someone else would have, my parents did nothing wrong. My bio mom was not keeping me, even though she could have financially. As far as the father goes, there was no "father". It's a non issue.
I'm fortunate to have been adopted by decent people. My mom, maybe not the perfect mom for me but good enough, my dad, couldn't have been a better dad for me. I know I am fortunate. There are some real wackos out there.
Vilifying good people who've adopted, pathologizing adopted people, and stereotyping and/or making victims out of all parents who make the choice to place their kids for adoption irritates the hell out of me as do inferences like you describe here...
"I only love my adoptive parents because they've tricked me into doing so, that if I were really educated about adoption ethics, I would realize that "those people" are not my parents and even though they raised me from babyhood, they are nothing more than long time babysitters who I happen to care about."
I've been reading some blogs of former foster kids who'd have given anything to have had the life I did. These are the people my stomach hurts for, people who didn't have good or any parents, bio or adopted.
Great, fearless post.
I'm going to post my comment and link here, hope that's ok? If it's not, lemme know!
I only "blame" my ap's for wanting a baby.
In their defense, they had no idea that raising a stranger's child would be so very different than raising a child of their own. I cannot really even blame them for their attitudes....it was 1966. There wasn't much research on adoption and the trauma surrounding it. They bought into the lies the agency gave them.
I don't blame my f parents, either. They did make the final decision, and could have parented me. They did not. Again- they had no idea how adoption would affect me, themselves, or children who came after me.
As far as "no adoption is ethical" goes, I do believe that no newborn adoptions are ethical now. Neither are international adoptions. They are rarely in the best interest of the child. They are because of the WANTS of the ap's. They are about money and the wants of the infertile paps.
I think it is a rare case for a mother who has all the financial means necessary to raise a child to deliberately "want" to place her child for adoption.
Not "choose", not "place", but "want."
That is not to say it doesn't happen, and I think that if the mother truly DOES NOT WANT her child, then so be it - adoption is necessary; otherwise growing up with a mother who clearly doesn't want you is just going to cause more suffering.
I just don't understand it. It frustrates me.
On the other hand, without invalidating your experience, because I know there are parents who willingly place their children for adoption even with the resources available to assist them, it does tend to lead to the stereotype that if a parent truly did not WANT their child to be adopted, they wouldn't have signed the damn papers, therefore adoption IS a choice.
But I like your post a lot. I like that you defend your adoptive parents. Tbh I don't do that because then any other points I make will become lost in "You can't criticize your parents, they raised you!"
My adoptive parents are my parents. Their choices have had effects on me, both good and bad.
"Neither are international adoptions. They are rarely in the best interest of the child."
I'm afraid I would have to agree. Socially and economically, parents in the Second World and Third World nations do NOT have the same support as those in the First World nation(s).
However, I do disagree that no adoption can be ethical. If the parents have support and necessary means with which to raise their child and still deliberately place their child, then yes, in that case it is solely a decision and ethical.
I understand what you are saying, Mei Ling. It's a slippery slope. But I also slightly disagree with you. I think that assuming that most (all) women, had they been granted ideal circumstances, would want to raise their children is a pretty safe estimate. However, there IS an element of choice, particularly now, that is uncomfortable for people to come to terms with. Sure, I'd love to think that my parents placed me because they had no other choice, because their backs were up against the wall. Because hey- that means I *WAS* wanted, that my separation from my biological family was a desperate choice made in desperate times.
But thats just not true. A lot of people DO have choices. I'm not saying that the choice is easy to make. Far from it. But there are plenty of poor, desperate, people who keep their babies. If what separates them from the women who place for adoption isn't "choice"- what is it?
I understand that the element of "choice" is hotly debated and a very fine line to walk. I know there are women who literally had no choice (particularly during the EMS). BUT insinuating that no element of choice or freewill is present when placing ones child for adoption is insulting to me. No one wants to imagine that some people just..don't want to or feel they cant raise a baby. No one wants to think that a mother would willingly separate from her child. But they do.
Call it an uncomfortable truth, but I stick by it.
Hey Amanda, I just wanted to chime in and say that I appreciate your post and point of view. There will unfortunately be children who need homes; thank god some of them get good and loving ones. We need to help adoptive and foster parents be more effective, and understand the affects trauma has on children.
I agree with Sunday. But again, there is always a "slippery slope", you know? I see "experts" and "professionals" who want to educate ap's about how adoption trauma affects an adoptee, and themselves for that matter, because let's face it...it's not always a walk in the park to raise an adoptee. Many of these "experts" then turn around and try to HELP people adopt. To me, that is highly unethical.
"No one wants to imagine that some people just..don't want to or feel they cant raise a baby. No one wants to think that a mother would willingly separate from her child. But they do. "
They do, that is true. I know someone in person who probably wouldn't care if her child was taken from her. There's just no bond there. No emotional attachment. Zip.
What disturbs me, however, is when people act like this is okay. When people act like it's the majority moral standpoint.
I mean, you have people who go "But what about all the abused children?"
Abused children should never be left in physical harm, even if that means removing them from their mothers. I will never argue that.
But the point is, not every mother "would have been" abusive, and this is frequently the assumption that's been made.
Thanks :)
--
http://www.miriadafilms.ru/ купить кино
для сайта foundyourmittens.blogspot.com
Posta un commento